Auction world watches fight over painting
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Sixteenth century painting is at the centre of a dispute over ownership which could have far-reaching implications for the international art market, a court heard yesterday.
The painting, by Joachim Wtewael, a contemporary of Shakespeare, vanished from Germany after the Second World War and was bought by a Panamanian Corporation who tried to sell it in 1989.
But the tiny masterpiece, The Holy Family with Saints John and Elizabeth and Angels, was withdrawn from sale in April 1992 when doubts about its provenance were raised.
Since then the painting, which measures just eight inches by six, has remained in safekeeping at Sotheby's pending the outcome of the dispute between the City of Gotha together with the Federal Republic of Germany and the Panamanian company Cobert Finance SA.
Alexander Layton QC, for the German authorities, told Mr Justice Moses that his decision would be closely watched by the London auction houses at the centre of the art trade.
"There are many thousands of works of art known to exist before this century's wars, which remain hidden, and it is thought that the outcome of this case may have a significant bearing on the extent to which those who now have those lost works of art will sell them for their own profit, without fear of claims by their rightful owners," he said.
The court heard that the story of the painting, believed to be worth at least pounds 700,000, was "like something out of a detective novel". It had been owned by the Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha since 1826 and, from 1928, formed part of a collection known as the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha Ducal Foun- dation for Art and Science.
During the Second World War, it was probably put into storage at a castle in what was to become the German Democratic Republic.
However its fate at the end of the war was in dispute, the court heard. Cobert claimed that Adolf Kozlenkov, a colonel in the Soviet forces from Latvia, took the picture. The German authorities said this story was a fabrication and that military archives showed no sign of a colonel from Latvia called Kozlenkov. They argue that the most likely sequence of events was that the painting was taken from Gotha by Soviet soldiers and kept in the Soviet Union until 1986, from where, it was agreed, it was eventually taken to Berlin. In November 1988, it was acquired by a Mrs Breslav who took it to Sotheby's before selling it to Cobert.
Cobert is expected to argue that the authorities have lost all rights of possession and ownership to the painting. They claim that under the limitation period set out by the German Civil Code, the authorities had only 30 years from the date in the mid 1940s when the painting was removed from the possession of the Foundation in which to bring a claim for its return.
The case continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments