Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Archer's novel approach to crown

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The princes William and Harry could be side-stepped to allow the crown to pass to the Princess Royal under a private member's bill being prepared by Lord Archer, the author and friend of John Major.

The Queen and close members of the Royal Family who have formed a group to consider changes to the monarchy are believed to support Lord Archer's proposal to change the 11th-century laws of succession through the male line.

Lord Archer, a Tory life peer, said he had decided to table a bill to end primogeniture after hearing the Queen was interested in seeing a change in the law. She discussed the idea with her group at Balmoral when Mr Major visited.

It is unlikely a bill will reach the Statute Book before the election but Lord Archer's intervention could raise the issue for later action.

The divorce of the Prince and Princess of Wales raised public doubts about the succession. The Princess Royal, who remarried, may be seen as a more popular choice for the succession than Prince Charles or his sons and would also give him the freedom to marry Camilla Parker Bowles.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in