Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Apology for poor care by surgeon

Jeremy Laurance
Monday 16 August 1999 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

AN NHS trust apologised to patients yesterday for the poor standard of care provided by an ear nose and throat surgeon.

An independent review of the work of Julian Upton, 62, who was employed at the Musgrove Park Hospital in Taunton for 38 years, concluded that his management of patients was "not adequate".

The review, published yesterday, was ordered by the Taunton and Somerset NHS Trust after colleagues raised concerns about Mr Upton's work last October. Mr Upton retired on medical advice in March.

Of 1,200 patients whose cases have so far been examined, 45 were identified as requiring further surgical treatment and a further 22 needed further investigation.Some of the affected patients are seeking compensation.

Edward McNally, chief executive of the trust, said yesterday: "The trust regrets that some patients have received treatment which was not adequate for their condition, and the trust apologises to those patients for any anxiety or distress caused by that treatment."

The review would take six months to complete, Mr McNally said, by which time 2,000 case records would have been examined.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in