Dutch government shelves plans to reduce flights from Amsterdam's busy Schiphol Airport
The Dutch government has abandoned, for now, plans to rein in flights at Amsterdam’s busy Schiphol Airport
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Dutch government said Tuesday it has abandoned, for now, plans to rein in flights at Amsterdam's busy Schiphol Airport following protests from countries including the United States and warnings that the move could breach European law and aviation agreements.
The government last year announced plans to reduce the number of flights from 500,000 per year to 460,000 at Schiphol, one of Europe's busiest aviation hubs.
In a letter to lawmakers Minister for Infrastructure and Water Mark Harbers said the plan was being shelved “until further notice” and at least pending a decision by the country's Supreme Court.
The court is considering the government's appeal against a lower court's decision in May that blocked plans to reduce the number of flights. The Supreme Court ruling is expected in the second quarter of 2024.
Schiphol said in a statement it was “disappointed by the recent developments, as local residents are getting the short end of the stick.”
The planned cuts were intended to reduce noise pollution for residents near the airport on Amsterdam's southern outskirts.
Schiphol said the decision would lead to “more uncertainty, including for the aviation sector itself. It is time that hindrance for local residents is noticeably reduced.”
In his letter to lawmakers, Harbers wrote that U.S. authorities had called the reduction in flights “unjust, discriminatory and anti-competitive for airlines.”
Dutch airline KLM called the decision to shelve the plan “an important step to prevent retaliation and to continue flying to the US.”
KLM said in a statement it has agreed to a number of announced measures, including a “cleaner, quieter and more economical plan, to accelerate the reduction of noise pollution,” adding it shares the government’s environmental concerns and is "fully committed to reducing its environmental footprint.”
Environmental groups in the Netherlands, including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, called the decision “shocking.”
“There is so much at stake here. As a result, local residents are left in the lurch and the climate is further heated,” the groups wrote.
“This is a major setback, but the number of flights will have to be reduced to make the Netherlands livable and to tackle the climate crisis,” they added.