R.E.M. celebrates 'a very radical departure' 25 years ago with their album 'Up'
Twenty-five years ago, an R
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Twenty-five years ago, an R.E.M. album arrived that didn't sound like a typical R.E.M. album.
āUp,ā the band's 11th album which dropped in the fall of 1998, was a curious and challenging collection that split fans and critics alike but reveals more interesting things with each listen. A newly remastered reissue out Friday offers a chance to reevaluate.
āA lot of people may not have liked it because it didnāt sound like āR.E.M.,ā whatever that is. But that was not the point. We were not trying to sound like R.E.M. We were trying to sound like the three guys that we were at the time,ā Mike Mills, bassist and band co-founder, tells The Associated Press.
āUpā peaked at No. 3 on the Billboard Top 200 and was certified gold, while single āDaysleeperā was a Top 20 alternative radio hit. Another single, āLotus,ā peaked at No. 31 on both the alternative and mainstream rock charts.
āI think it rewards repeated listenings because there is a depth to it. It is not a surface record,ā said Mills. āI think that that R.E.M. fans will be rewarded with a deeper consideration. But it may not be to everyoneās taste, and thatās certainly fine as well.ā
In the liner notes for the Craft Recordings anniversary reissue, journalist Josh Modell calls it āthe beautiful but misunderstood, complex but overlooked, difficult but incredibly rewarding red-headed stepchild of the R.E.M. catalog.ā
āUpā was created in the wake of turmoil for the group ā Mills, singer Michael Stipe and guitarist Peter Buck. They had become a band of three after drummer and co-founder Bill Berry left the group.
āIt was a fresh start for us as a three-piece,ā said Mills. āThere were no blueprints, there were no roadmaps. We were just completely winging it as a three-piece band, and I think we did a really good job.ā
The 14-track album opens with one of the more challenging songs in the band's catalogue, āAirportman,ā a hook-less, electronic scar of a song that seemed less welcoming and more off-putting.
āOur feeling was this is a whole new R.E.M. and if you stuck with us this far and you can stick with us through this song, then youāll be rewarded in later times to come,ā said Mills. āIt was kind of an act of defiance and a sly joke at the same time. I like the song. Itās just a very strange song to start the record off.ā
The rest of the album includes the almost too-R.E.M.-āLotus,ā the Beach Boys-ish āAt My Most Beautifulā and the painfully beautiful "Youāre In The Air." Many of the songs curl into static or sonic distortion at the end, as if fire was licking at their edges. The last song, āFalls to Climbā is about a stoning, a bummer of a goodbye.
āIt was meant to be jarring,ā said Mills. āThere was no way that we were going to pretend that nothing had changed. We were a completely different band at that point. And so we decided to make a record of a completely different band. I think there are some truly beautiful moments. There are some powerful moments.ā
The Detroit Free Press called the album āone of the most gorgeous, enchanting works in the groundbreaking groupās two-decade body of work.ā But Pitchfork was unmoved, saying it was a ādistant, impersonal record.ā
The San Antonio Express-News said it needed time to digest: āThough darker and less hook-y than any R.E.M. record to date, āUpā will reward listeners whose attention span is longer than the average Top 40 single.ā Stereogum at the albums 20th anniversary said it was āone of the more flawed and fascinating documents of R.E.M.ās music.ā
āI expected people to be shocked and surprised,ā said Mills. āBut, the truth is, our fans know to expect left turns from us. They know we tried not to repeat ourselves. We didnāt want to make the same record twice. This just happened to be a very radical departure.ā
A deluxe 2-CD or Blu-Ray edition of āUpā out Friday also includes the bandās previously unreleased set from a guest appearance on the TV series āParty of Five,ā which includes āMan on the Moon,ā āLosing My Religion,ā and āItās the End of the World as We Know It (and I Feel Fine).ā
āUpā relied primarily on drum machines, loops and synthesizers, creating dreamlike moments akin to the band Radiohead, also experimenting with sounds and distortions at the time. Mills said R.E.M. were already heading in that direction.
āPeter had already bought a bunch of keyboards, vintage keyboards and old drum machines, and we were going to make something like this record anyway. But the degree to which we made that change was certainly enhanced by the circumstances,ā he said.
"We were just kind of fumbling and finding our way and we basically erased all the rules. We said whatever methods and rules we had used to this point, theyāre all out the window. We were trying to make it as liberating as possible."
___
Mark Kennedy is at http://twitter.com/KennedyTwits