Even with carbon emissions cuts, a key part of Antarctica is doomed to slow collapse, study says
A new study says no matter how much the world cuts back on carbon emissions, a key and sizable chunk of Antarctica is essentially doomed to an unavoidable melt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab27d/ab27d4fd195b8eaf782740e105cee410f561acfb" alt="Antarctic Glacier"
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No matter how much the world cuts back on carbon emissions, a key and sizable chunk of Antarctica is essentially doomed to an āunavoidableā melt, a new study found.
Though the full melt will take hundreds of years, slowly adding nearly 6 feet (1.8 meters) to sea levels, it will be enough to reshape where and how people live in the future, the studyās lead author said.
Researchers used computer simulations to calculate future melting of protective ice shelves jutting over Antarcticaās Amundsen Sea in western Antarctica. The study in Mondayās journal Nature Climate Change found even if future warming was limited to just a few tenths of a degree more ā an international goal that many scientists say is unlikely to be met ā it would have ālimited power to prevent ocean warming that could lead to the collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.ā
āOur main question here was: How much control do we still have over ice shelf melting? How much melting can still be prevented by reducing emissions?ā said study lead author Kaitlin Naughten, an oceanographer at the British Antarctic Survey. āUnfortunately, itās not great news. Our simulations suggest that we are now committed to the rapid increase in the rate of ocean warming and ice shelf melting over the rest of the century.ā
While past studies have talked about how dire the situation is, Naughten was the first to use computer simulations to study the key melting component of warm water melting ice from below, and the work looked at four different scenarios for how much carbon dioxide the world pumps into the atmosphere. In each case, ocean warming was just too much for this section of the ice sheet to survive, the study found.
Naughten looked at melting gatekeeper ice shelves, which float over the ocean in this area of Antarctica that is already below sea level. Once these ice shelves melt, thereās nothing to stop the glaciers behind them from flowing into the sea.
Naughten specifically looked at what would happen if somehow future warming was limited to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) over mid-19th century levels ā the international goal ā and found the runaway melting process anyway. The world has already warmed about 1.2 degrees Celsius (nearly 2.2 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times and much of this summer temporarily shot past the 1.5 mark.
Naughtenās study concentrated on the part of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet that is most at risk from melting from below, near the Amundsen Sea. It includes the massive Thwaites ice shelf that is melting so fast it got the nickname āthe Doomsday Glacier.ā West Antarctica is only one-tenth of the southern continent but is more unstable than the larger eastern side.
That part of Antarctica āis doomed,ā said University of California Irvine ice scientist Eric Rignot, who wasnāt part of the study. āThe damage has already been done.ā
University of Colorado ice scientist Ted Scambos, who also wasnāt part of the study, said this ice sheet āeventually is going to collapse. Itās not a happy conclusion and it is one that Iām only saying reluctantly.ā
Naughten doesnāt like to use the word ādoomed,ā because she said 100 years from now the world might not just stop but reverse carbon levels in the air and global warming. But she said whatās happening now on the ground is a slow collapse that canāt be stopped, at least not in this century.
āI think itās unavoidable that some of this area is lost. Itās unavoidable that the problem gets worse,ā Naughten told The Associated Press. āIt isnāt unavoidable that we lose all of it because sea level rise happens over the very long term. I only looked in this study up to 2100. So after 2100, we probably have some control still.''
No matter what words are used, Naughten said she and other scientists studying the area in previous research conclude that this part of Antarctica ācouldnāt be saved or a lot of it couldnāt be saved.ā
Naughtenās study did not calculate how much ice would be lost, how much sea level would rise and at what speed. But she estimated that the amount of ice in the area most at risk if it all melted would raise sea levels by about 1.8 meters (5.9 feet).
However, she said, that is a slow process that would play out through the next few hundred years through the 2300s, 2400s and 2500s.
Naughten said that may seem like a long way away, but noted that if the Victorians of the 1800s had done something to drastically change the shape of our world, we would not look well on them.
This type of sea level rise would be āabsolutely devastatingā if it happened over 200 years, but if it could be stretched out over 2,000 years, humanity could adapt, Naughten said.
āCoastal communities will either have to build around or be abandoned," Naughten said.
While this part of Antarcticaās ice sheet is destined to be lost, other vulnerable sections of Earthās environment can still be saved by reducing heat-trapping emissions so there is reason to still cut back on carbon pollution, Naughten said.
Twila Moon, deputy chief scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center who wasnāt part of the research, said she worries that most people will see nothing but doom and gloom in the research.
āI donāt see a lot of hope,ā Naughten said. āBut itās what the science tells me. So thatās what I have to communicate to the world.ā
Naughten quoted former NASA scientist Kate Marvel, saying āwhen it comes to climate change we need courage and not hope. Courage is the resolve to do well without the assurance of a happy ending.ā
___
Read more of APās climate coverage at http://www.apnews.com/climate-and-environment.
___
Follow Seth Borenstein on X, formerly known as Twitter at @borenbears
___
Associated Press climate and environmental coverage receives support from several private foundations. See more about APās climate initiative here. The AP is solely responsible for all content.