PwC Australia sidelines 9 directors as leak of tax information investigated
The Australian branch of the PricewaterhouseCoopers consultancy network has ordered nine partners to go on leave while an inquiry examines the leaking of confidential Australian tax avoidance policy changes to corporate clients who could benefit from the information
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Australian branch of the PricewaterhouseCoopers consultancy network said Monday that nine of its partners were ordered to take leave during an inquiry into the leaking of confidential Australian tax avoidance policy changes to corporate clients who could benefit from the information.
PwC’s acting chief executive Kristin Stubbins apologized in announcing the directors are on leave pending a review of the firm’s governance, accountability and culture. A report is due in September.
“I want to apologize on behalf of PwC Australia for sharing confidential government tax policy information and for betraying the trust placed in us,” Stubbins said on an open letter.
The scandal has damaged the firm’s relationship with its biggest Australian client, the federal government, and sparked a police investigation initiated by the Treasury Department.
It has also raised questions about how conflicts of interests can be managed with governments’ increasing use of private sector consultants.
The firm said its former Australia tax partner Peter Collins breached confidentiality while working with the Australian government on changing tax avoidance rules for large multi-national companies to prevent them from shifting Australian profits to tax havens.
Collins left PwC in October and the Tax Practitioners’ Board, an industry regulator, cancelled his registration as a tax agent in December for dishonesty and for sharing confidential government briefings with PwC partners and staff.
Internal PwC documents made public this month showed the firm’s partners and staff were told in emails about planned multinational tax avoidance legislation. Clients also were charged for advice on how to get around the new tax laws.
PwC hired an external consultant, former CEO of the telecommunications company Telstra Ziggy Switkowski, to conduct an internal investigation. The directors are on leave pending the results of Switkowski’s inquiry
The Australian Federal Police announced last week it was investigating Collins and the probe could extend to other PwC employees.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese described what happened as “completely unacceptable.”
He said PwC could be refused future government contracts because of the breach of trust.
“Any government department undertaking work needs to bear in mind the ethical considerations that come from this PwC behavior,” Albanese told Sydney Radio 2SM.
PwC said it would “ringfence” – or separate from other PwC business – provision of services to government departments and agencies to prevent conflicts of interest.
Australia’s former trade watchdog Allan Fels, former chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, said governments at all levels were outsourcing too much work to the “Big Four” major professional services firms: PwC, Ernst and Young, Deloitte and KPMG.
“Government everywhere ... is making excessive use of consultants of this kind, and also where they use them, there needs to be much more transparency and accountability,” Fels told Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Albanese, whose government was elected a year ago, said the previous administration had shed to many public service jobs and relied too heavily on consultants to do the work during nine years in office.
“There are some plusses with some contracting out of services, but there’s also been, over a period of time, a loss in the capacity of the federal public service to provide that internal advice that avoids all of these risks, all of these for-profit motives,” Albanese said. “That is something that my government has been working on.”