Anti-hunt group shaken by row
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Bitter in-fighting between animal rights protesters in the League Against Cruel Sports, the oldest anti-hunting pressure group, burst into the open yesterday. James Barrington, the group's embattled executive director, quit claiming he had been hounded out by extremists.
League president Lord Soper was also reported to be on the verge of resignation, as an escalating dispute threatened to tear the group apart.
Mr Barrington lost a no-confidence vote on the 12-strong executive last week. He was kept on but faced angry criticism from sections of the League's 40,000 members for appearing to "go soft" on hunting in a controversial article in The Field magazine. They were infuriated at a suggestion that the League would "feel less antagonistic" towards the sport if hunters ceased practices such as using terriers to root out foxes which had successfully gone to ground.
Mr Barrington, who claimed "constructive dismissal" as the reason for his departure, said he was forced to leave when the executive agreed on Wednesday night to reinstate a member of staff who he sacked.
"I find that situation to be untenable," he said. "My position has been undermined to a degree. This is part of a campaign. Indeed some people admit that is the way they wished to proceed, to make my job untenable so that I would have to go."
John Bryant, another leading member of the organisation, categorically denied the claims. "I do not recognise the situation Mr Barrington is painting," he told the same programme.
"There is absolutely no-one in the League who wants hunting to remain as cruel as possible to favour our campaign. We would welcome the abolition of certain aspects of fox hunting.
Mr Barrington had infuriated two-thirds of the staff by the "unfair and unlawful" dismissal of two colleagues for trivial offences and caused further aggravation by the article for The Field, he said.
League officials insisted that the 71-year-old organisation would survive, but acknowledged"huge internal conflict".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments