Anger at GM trials changes
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SCIENTISTS ON the key committee which oversees trials of genetically modified crops are angry at plans by Environment minister Michael Meacher to replace almost all of them at once.
Members of the 13-member Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (Acre) have written to Mr Meacher to protest that his plan, leaked last week, will weaken their combined experience and expertise. It comes, they argue, just as growing concern over GM crops and food means that both are more important than ever.
Dr Julian Kinderlerer, of the University of Sheffield's biology and biotechnology department, who has been on Acre since its inception in 1992, told The Independent: "Some of us hit the roof when we were told about it last week.
"I have written to Mr Meacher to say that there is a difference between expertise and experience, and we need to have both represented on the committee.
"It is all very well knowing the theoretical analysis of a crop's risks. But you need someone who can point out that it will be farmed by two men pushing a wheelbarrow, neither of whom cares about genetic release."
Professor Alan Gray, another Acre member, said: "The point is that it is a committee which deals with science. There may be a bias of people from industry - but would you prefer to fly in an aeroplane designed by people with degrees in ethics, or aerospace design?"
Acre is crucial in deciding what GM crops are approved for trials in Britain, and how widely they might be introduced.
But its critics contend that it has never turned down any application for GM crop trials, and has refused to consider suggestions by English Nature, the official conservation advisers to the Government, for a moratorium on the commercial growing of GM crops.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments