Amnesty 'will have no impact on criminals'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The national firearms amnesty called in the wake of the Dunblane massacre was launched by the Home Secretary, Michael Howard yesterday, writes James Cusick. Yet Mr Howard himself questioned the efficacy of the amnesty, and warned it would have no impact on hardened criminals.
Under the scheme, which runs until the end of this month, illegal weapons can be handed into police stations without fear of prosecution provided the weapons have not been used in any crime. Despite his reservations Mr Howard said: "Every gun has the capacity to kill - the more we can take out of circulation the better."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments