Amazon rainforest destruction slows
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Burning and logging continue to devastate huge tracts of the Amazon forest but the pace of destruction has slowed by more than half in the past two years, according to official figures released yesterday.
A record 11,600 square miles of Brazil's Amazon rainforest were burned or cut down in 1995.
The rate slowed to 7,200 square miles in 1996 and to an estimated 5,200 square miles in 1997, according to a five-month study conducted by the National Space Research Institute.
"These numbers are no reason to celebrate," the Brazilian Environment Minister, Gustavo Kraus, said at the long-awaited presentation of the study based on satellite images of the forest.
Mr Kraus noted that much of the slowdown in destruction was due to the abnormally heavy rainfall in Amazonia, a region of 2 million square miles.
Between 1978 and 1996, more than 200,000 square miles of forest or 12.5 per cent of the total Amazonia forest has disappeared.
- AP, Sao Jose dos Campos
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments