Allitt case is worst example
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BEVERLY ALLITT was a 21- year-old nurse working on the wards of Grantham and Kesteven General Hospital in 1991 when children started dying in mysterious circumstances.
Several turned out to have been injected with insulin or other drugs and when they showed signs of distress it was often Allitt who was the first to raise the alarm. She was credited with saving the lives of several children by her prompt action, winning herself the attention she desperately craved.
She was convicted on 28 May 1993 on four counts of murder and nine counts of attempted murder.
Allitt is an extreme case of Munchausen's by proxy, but some psychiatrists believe the diagnosis is unhelpful. Dr Kerry Bluglass, a senior lecturer at Birmingham University, told the annual conference of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in June that there was no illness of Munchausen's by proxy but it was a shorthand term for the abuse of children.
Most, in her experience, were women of low intellect, often with a dominating husband, who misused hospital as a place for comfort and support and often did not realise substances such as Calpol and salt could be dangerous.
She told the conference: "It is a good idea if you can avoid labelling people. You have a better chance of understanding the patient without pushing them into denial."
Jeremy Laurance
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments