Air crew 'seduced by speed'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An RAF crew who crashed into the Mull of Kintyre with the loss of 29 lives may have been "seduced" to their deaths by the speed of their newly-delivered Chinook Mark II helicopter, the inquiry into the accident was told yesterday.
They may have known they were close to the Mull but chose the wrong rate of climb to clear it, a wing commander who headed the RAF board of inquiry into the tragedy said. They may have done so partly because of tiny navigation errors, and partly because of a "mindset" which made them think the Mull was to their right, and not directly ahead of them.
But he told the inquiry he did not consider them negligent - and the exact cause of the accident had not been established.
The wing commander, whose name is being withheld on security grounds, told the hearing at Paisley, Strathclyde: "I believe they knew they were in close proximity to it. My own personal belief is they were seduced by their high ground speed in an aircraft flying some 20 to 25 knots faster than they would be accustomed to."
He said the board of inquiry findings were based on "logical argument" based on limited evidence in the absence of a cockpit voice recorder, survivors or eyewitnesses. Although there must be an element of "speculation", it was the likeliest scenario.
The inquiry continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments