Advertising: Ageist employers up to old tricks
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The number of ageist job advertisements has fallen but employers are still excluding older people by using coded language, a survey has revealed.
The three-month survey of more than 8,000 advertisments showed the number stipulating age limit had halved over the past two years to 6 per cent but many companies are using phrases such as "a young team" or "a young outlook" to signal the preferred age of applicants.
Studies in the 1980s found 30-42 per cent of adverts contained age limits, but since then employers have been told it is not acceptable to discriminate on the basis of age. However, as yet there are no official regulations governing job adverts. In the 10 years to 1997 the number of men aged 40-64 and women aged 40-59 who were unemployed or classed as economically inactive rose by 79,000 to 4.2 million.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments