Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Accountant on maternity leave 'sacked after cancer diagnosis'

Monday 11 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An accountant was sacked after she was diagnosed as having cancer while pregnant, an industrial tribunal was told today.

Carole Coe, 30, had to undergo painful chemotherapy treatment, and a hysterectomy, after giving birth to her daughter Sarah last year. She told her employers at a snack-food firm that she would be able to return to work in May 1995. Instead, she was dismissed, the Manchester hearing was told.

Ms Coe, of Hyde, Greater Manchester, is claiming sex discrimination against the Leeds-based Tee-Gee Snacks, which employs 200 people at two factories. She is claiming more than pounds 180,000 compensation - five years' salary plus more than pounds 80,000 in life assurance benefits which she has lost.

On 6 April 1994, her doctor told her she was pregnant. The baby was due in December, and Ms Coe handed a pregnancy certificate to Tee-Gee's personnel manager, Tony Bass. Later, she took two weeks' sick leave because of a threatened miscarriage. "When I returned in June 1994, I felt they were trying to . . . undermine my position," she told the tribunal, saying that she was no longer invited to planning meetings.

Ms Coe left the company in July as her pregnancy progressed. On 19 August, she was told she had cancer. The company's finance director, Richard Fullwell ,visited her, and she told him she was entitled to maternity leave until January 1995.

"He said he had heard a rumour I was willing to go for pounds 20,000 [her annual salary]." Ms Coe said. She replied that this was not true, and that she wanted to continue [working] after the baby was born.

Sarah was born prematurely in October 1994. The following month Ms Coe left hospital after a hysterectomy in a "great deal of pain". At the end of November, she started "particularly rough" chemotherapy.

She had explained the situation to her employers who seemed happy that she should return to work in May 1995.

A short time later Mr Bass rang her. "He told me that due to the life insurance policy with the company's occupational pension scheme, the company had an interest in my estate and that I should make a will in case the treatment did not work," she said. "I was shocked . . . but said I would think about it."

When she returned home, she received a dismissal letter from Tee-Gee, enclosing her P45. Ms Coe, who is now in remission from the disease, said the company had not said anything previously about her leaving. "The assurance was there that I would be returning to work," she said. "I was told my sick note was not a problem."

But she did notice that her desk had gone from her office.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in