A pee spells trouble for Scrabble champion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A former national Scrabble champion is claiming that spending a penny in the Burstin Hotel cost him victory in a scrabble tournament - and pounds 200 in prize money.
Mike Goldman, a solicitor, is suing competition organisers for pounds 5,000 following his loss in the second match of an 11-game Scrabble tournament in December 1990. Yesterday he told Central London County Court how he decided to go to the lavatory during his opponent's turn. To get there he had to fight his way through five crowded rooms and negotiate a convention of cowboys and cowgirls. When he finally reached the lavatories, he had to queue.
Any relief gained by Mr Goldman, 62, was short-lived.
He returned to his seat 10 minutes later to find his opponent, Cambridge Scrabble Club member John Rusted, had scored 76 points with the word "fanners" (which used up all his letters) and then started the timing clock for Mr Goldman's move. Mr Goldman, who said he told the tournament director where he was going, claimed he was not warned the game might start without him. "If I had had the extra four minutes I think in the circumstances my superior skill would have enabled me to overcome the disability of 76 points and very probably win the game," he said. "I believe I was being cheated and deprived of the opportunity of winning the tournament and a little bit of recognition."
Mr Goldman is seeking aggravated damages from three Association of Premier Scrabble Players' officials. Graeme Thomas, Clive Spate and Allan Simmons all deny liability.
Mr Goldman's barrister, Michael Duggan, told Judge Anthony Hallgarten QC, that the central issue was whether the organisers were under a contractual duty to apply the rules "fairly, reasonably and prop- erly", and whether sufficient time had been allotted between games for visits to the loo.
The case continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments