Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

30,000 jobs bounced out

Barrie Clement
Wednesday 17 April 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Around one in ten banking jobs could be lost as a result of a change in the law which will mean cheques could be "bounced" electronically.

The 30,000 redundancies - caused by a system in which there would no longer be a physical exchange of cheques between banks - would come on top of an estimated 37,000 job losses already predicted to go under the general drive for increasing productivity.

Treasury ministers want to relax the Bills of Exchange and the Cheques Acts which stipulate that cheques have to move between banks. If, for instance, an account holder at Lloyds accepts a cheque as payment from a Barclays customer, Lloyds has to pass the cheque back to Barclays so that it can verify there are funds to meet the debt.

The Government is planning to change the law so that the verification can be completed on screen. Ministers are hoping to amend the law before the summer, or by autumn at the latest.

That would mean thousands of jobs would go in high-street branches, plus 40 per cent of staff dedicated to the clearing system, the Banking Insurance and Finance Union says. The estimate of job losses comes from a senior source in Lloyds, according to the union which wants to ensure that all staff displaced are redeployed.

Ed Sweeney, general secretary of the union, said that while a Treasury consultation paper on the subject concerned itself with safeguards to protect customers from fraud, it made no reference to the social consequences of the change. "It's time we ended the scandal of overworked and understaffed branches who get by only on overtime, paid and unpaid."

A spokeswoman for Lloyds-TSB said that even with a change in the law it would be "a long time" before banks agreed on implementation of the new system. She added: "We don't know what the implications for jobs are, but the union estimate has no basis in fact ... at Lloyds we have a record of redeploying employees and cutting staff through natural wastage."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in