Whisky galore - but no buyers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Investors who bought casks of malt whisky last year, only to lose out, are now being offered a chance to cut their losses and get shot of their liquid assets. The reprieve comes by way of a scheme being proposed by a lawyer from Kendal, Cumbria. By banding together with others and offering a "job lot" of whisky to the trade, solicitor Paul Smith offers the hope of a better price than anyone on their own could get.
Mr Smith is among thousands of people who own whisky that is worth far less than they paid for it. Last year he dispensed with pounds 3,750 for a cask of 1989 single malt from the now-defunct Napier Spirit Company. He, and many others, invested following reports that people could make 18 per cent a year on their holdings. According to Mr Smith, Scotch whisky brokers now value his spirit at just pounds 600.
The only people who might recover what they paid out are those who bought 1995 or 1996 casks, according to Mr Smith. "They might get back their investments, but anybody who bought 1989 or 1990 malts will lose the most. The worst-off are those who thought they were buying the better product," he says.
Unfortunately for Mr Smith and others, they cannot even rely on getting the low quoted trade prices because, according to the Scotch Whisky Association, there is no established secondary market for private sales of single casks of malt whisky since brokers normally only deal in bulk. The minimum number of casks that the trade will handle is 40 hogsheads. Hence Mr Smith's call to other whisky investors. "I realised early on that the only way we would get anything is to amalgamate holdings," says Mr Smith.
With the help of the Insolvency Service, he has written to Napier's creditors, who number more than 1,100, to establish the age and brands of their malts. He is now opening up the service to investors in other firms - Hamilton Spirit Management Company, for example - which have failed, or been closed down in the public interest by the Department of Trade and Industry.
So far, 400 investors have replied. When he has enough of each malt Mr Smith will contact brokers or distilleries to establish a price. Time, for now, is on the investors' side as most of the malts sold to private buyers are a few years from maturity.
The only alternative for investors is to bottle their Scotch for drinking. A hogshead, the typical investment, produces 400 bottles of whisky, and investors will also have to pay excise duty before they can take the whisky out of bonded warehouses. This duty amounts to around pounds 2,750 on a hogshead.
Many investors, including Mr Smith, bought their spirit without a bottling deal. Again, Mr Smith believes it will be easier for investors to bottle their whisky in bulk. "Many of the bottlers will not want to know about bottling a single hogshead of malt," he says. "The idea is to get together anyone who wants to bottle their malt. If you have 100 casks, they will do it."
q Paul Smith can be contacted on 01539 729555.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments