EU tax row is a bitter pill for politicians

David Prosser
Friday 22 April 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A European court case brought by Cadbury Schweppes could force both Labour and the Conservatives to break their manifesto promises not to raise taxes, a leading accountancy firm said yesterday.

Blick Rothenberg warned that the Cadbury case, due to be heard in the European Court of Justice later this year, could end up costing UK taxpayers billions of pounds, whichever party wins the election.

Cadbury is bringing a test case against the Government over the way UK tax laws prevent multinational companies exploiting the different rates of business tax charged across the European Union.

Currently, the Inland Revenue does not allow multinationals to channel profits through subsidiaries in other EU countries where tax rates are lower.

In theory, businesses stand to benefit by declaring all their profits in the EU member state charging the lowest rate of corporation tax - in Ireland, the rate is just 10 per cent, for example, a third of the level charged in the UK. But unless companies can show that profits were actually generated in a different country, the Revenue demands tax on the income at UK rates.

Cadbury's legal team will argue that such regulations breach the company's right to organise its affairs within the EU as it sees fit. The Court will be told the Revenue's approach contravenes freedom of trade laws.

Steven Bruck, a partner at Blick Rothenberg, said the case could lead to a string of large companies seeking billions of pounds in tax refunds. "The tax figures on which all parties have based their projections could be completely undermined by decisions of the Court," he said. "How will each of the parties finance these potential major losses of government revenue, which are beginning to look ever more likely?"

The Cadbury case follows a similar dispute with Marks & Spencer, which was decided in favour of the retailer last year. Tax experts have since estimated that the M&S verdict will reduce government tax revenues by £1bn a year.

A spokesman for Cadbury confirmed the case was going ahead but said the company had not yet been notified of when a hearing would be held.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in