Will councils price commerce out of the high street?

Labour wants business rates set locally, as they were in the days before poll tax. Paul Gosling ponders the implications

Paul Gosling
Tuesday 25 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Local councils could become less dependent on central government grants if local control over the business rate is restored - but it could mean higher bills for businesses, according to new research from the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Business rates have been set nationally in England and Wales since the 1990 reform of local government finance - the measure that introduced the poll tax - and in Scotland since the beginning of the current financial year.

But the Labour Party is committed to returning the business rate to local control, which it says would help to re-establish dialogue between councils and commerce. In a consultation paper released in February it asked for proposals on the relationship between the business rate and the council tax.

The IFS study, published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation as part of a series on local government finance, emphasises that it is not possible to reinstate the system that existed before 1990, because of changes in the system of distributing government grants. Businesses pay much less towards council spending than they did when rates were set locally, while government grants now contribute much more.

The effect of returning business tax to local control would depend on the proportion of council spending businesses would be expected to bear, and the balance between local taxation and government grant. If business were to contribute about 60 per cent of extra spending - the proportion it paid under the old system - then the business rate would be likely to increase by about 4 per cent, with council tax payments decreasing substantially in high spending areas. The biggest changes would occur in inner London.

The IFS has put forward four models of how a localised business rate might work. One of the most important variables is to determine how much equalisation should take place of government grant - in other words, districts that yield high rates losing grant in favour of poorer areas.

The researchers concluded that even with what is known as full equalisation of the business rate, the rate levied would vary enormously, with the highest rate half as much again as the lowest. The study also suggested that other forms of local taxation, including a local income tax, would be more effective in broadening the local tax base.

Abolition of the old system was in part caused by concerns that businesses were moving out of highly taxed areas, where their income was most needed. IFS researchers agree that a return to a localised business tax could lead to location choices being influenced by business tax rates.

Stephen Smith, of the IFS, says: "I think evidence as to whether it matters is relatively unclear. Most of the studies have found it very difficult to find any evidence - but that is not surprising, as they are quite long- term factors. There is evidence of a different sort. The previous system might have had big effects. Businesses had to be considerably more profitable to continue to trade, and this would obviously have had an effect on location."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in