the suits

Tuesday 04 July 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Labour MP Austin Mitchell is the man the accountancy profession loves to hate. But while the outpourings of the member for Great Grimsby can be dismissed as the sort of thing you would expect of a politician and former journalist, the man widely described as his scriptwriter is somewhat harder to deal with.

For Prem Sikka acts from within. Recently appointed a professor at East London University's department of accounting, he and a few like-minded colleagues at other academic institutions have been jousting with the profession - particularly over the issue of regulation - for several years.

Recently, though, Professor Sikka - who has found himself reported to his academic superiors for his troubles - has upped the ante. He has twice stood for election to the council of the Chartered Association of Certified Accountants - coming bottom of the poll the last time - and has just organised a petition calling for greater democracy in the selection of the organisation's president.

Contrasting the situation with that at trade unions and other organisations, he condemns the arrangement by which "an inner committee of the council nominates presidents up to three years ahead".

The association says this is to allow those chosen for office to prepare for their roles and points to the wide variety of backgrounds shown by recent past presidents. However, Professor Sikka is not impressed. He wants to go ahead with the extraordinary general meeting to which he says his petition of more than 100 signatures entitles him.

Nor is he about to agree that it makes "economic sense" - as the association puts it - to run the meeting together with the one the officers have called to approve changing the organisation's name.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in