How much you should already have saved for retirement – you’re probably about 60 per cent short

Generation X needs to have already saved £187,400 by today to retire on £19,000 a year

Kate Hughes
Money Editor
Tuesday 26 February 2019 05:13 EST
Comments
Cashing in on Brexit?
Cashing in on Brexit? (PA)

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Retirement saving. It’s not sexy or fun and it won’t increase your vital stats on social media.

But if you want to be sure of living out your twilight years without constantly worrying about money, it’s a must.

The problem is that most of us haven’t got a clue how much we need or how we’re going to do it.

The latest terrifying figures seen exclusively by The Independent show, for example, that Generation X needs to have already saved £187,400 by today to retire on an income of £19,000 a year.

Nationwide, that would give them just enough cash for general living costs, one long-haul holiday and, if they’re lucky, a new car every five years unless they lived in London, where it wouldn’t even cover the basics.

In reality these 43- to 54-year-olds have only got around £70,400.

Millennials in their twenties and thirties, meanwhile, should have £73,500 slotted away if they want to achieve a stress-free old age.

Even 24-year-olds with an average of just a year in the workplace would already need to have saved £7,348, regardless of what else they’re paying off or saving for, according to financial adviser Salisbury House Wealth.

And by the time we hit 65, having ideally saved that £7,348 every single year over a 42-year career, we should have more than £308,000 to fund that £19,000 income.

In total, assuming inflation of 2.5 per cent, the adviser suggests we need a savings pot worth £323,000.

How do your savings shape up?

Check your age against the amount you need to have saved by now to see if you’re on track.

Age Annual income needed in retirement Amount needed in retirement (with retirement age of 67 and life expectancy of 82) Amount needed in retirement with an assumed long term inflation rate of 2.5% Amount to be saved each year (assuming start at 23 and finish at 67) Number of years saving so far Amount needed by 2019
24 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 1 £7,348
25 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 2 £14,695
26 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 3 £22,043
27 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 4 £29,391
28 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 5 £36,739
29 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 6 £44,086
30 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 7 £51,434
31 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 8 £58,782
32 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 9 £66,129
33 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 10 £73,477
34 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 11 £80,825
35 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 12 £88,173
36 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 13 £95,520
37 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 14 £102,868
38 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 15 £110,216
39 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 16 £117,564
40 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 17 £124,911
41 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 18 £132,259
42 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 19 £139,607
43 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 20 £146,950
44 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 21 £154,300
45 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 22 £161,650
46 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 23 £168,990
47 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 24 £176,350
48 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 25 £183,690
49 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 26 £191,040
50 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 27 £198,390
51 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 28 £205,740
52 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 29 £213,080
53 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 30 £220,430
54 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 31 £227,780
55 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 32 £235,130
56 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 33 £242,480
57 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 34 £249,830
58 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 35 £257,180
59 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 36 £264,530
60 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 37 £271,880
61 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 38 £279,230
62 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 39 £286,580
63 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 40 £293,930
64 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 41 £301,280
65 £19,000 £266,000 £323,300 £7,348 42 £308,630

Source: Salisbury House Wealth

The truth is that any contribution will help, especially as the state pension age continues to increase.

Tim Holmes, managing director at Salisbury House Wealth, says: “There is a big gap between what individuals need to have saved into their pension pot by this point and what they actually have.”

“When you start saving is just as important as how much you save each year.”

“In order to have saved enough by your mid-fifties, you need to start saving early. Incrementally building a private pension pot and investing with a sensible long term outlook will take you a long way to having the buffer you need when you finally reach retirement age.”

“The question that needs to be asked is whether you want to just survive in retirement or actually enjoy it.”

Trying to anticipate the answer, the government launched the ground-breaking workplace pension which this month has automatically enrolled 10 million savers.

“Getting 10 million more people to save for their retirement is an astonishing success,” says Tom McPhail, head of policy at Hargreaves Lansdown.

“Everyone who is now a member of a workplace pension is taking steps towards a more prosperous and better-funded retirement. The fact so few have opted out so far is testament to the effectiveness of this nudge; most people knew they needed to do this and are just glad someone has helped them make it happen.”

But if, on average, we’re still under-saving so significantly there are clearly still significant problems.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

The fundamental issue is one of engagement. We don’t really pay attention until we start to build up an amount that means something.

Studies show that once we’ve saved £5,000 the money suddenly becomes a little more interesting and we start becoming more interested in where the money is invested, how it performs and how to make it bigger, including saving more each month.

And we’ll need to. Despite contribution rates set to rise again in April to at least 3 per cent for employers and 5 per cent for employees, it still won’t be enough for most people.

“The pensions industry keeps demanding the government increase the statutory minimum contributions but they’re barking up the wrong tree,” argues McPhail.

“The answer to getting contribution rates up to an adequate, or even a good level lies in engaging members to make individual choices about how much they should be saving. It also lies in encouraging them to take control of their investment choices so they can make the most of the money they do save. For many pension scheme members, the default fund is not the best answer.”

So those enrolled in the workplace pension can’t afford to sit back on their laurels just yet.

But there are still another 9 million working adults who aren’t enrolled in the workplace pension, usually because they’re self-employed, too young (the qualifying age is currently 22 though it is likely to reduce to 18 in the mid-2020s), or they don’t earn enough from a single employment to be eligible. The lower income threshold is currently £10,000 though again, there are vague promises to scrap it completely at some point in the next few years.

Meanwhile there are millions of small “dormant” pension pots, caused when someone leaves a job and their retirement savings are left behind in their former employer’s pension scheme.

Multiplied out over people’s working lives and exacerbated by auto-enrolment, there is a risk of billions of pounds going to waste.

“Perhaps the biggest and most important challenge is to turn disengaged pension scheme members who have been auto-enrolled into active investors who can make sensible choices about what to do with their money,” adds McPhail.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in