Questions Of Cash: O2 sold my shares, but didn't tell me

Paul Gosling
Friday 21 October 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A. O2 has followed the example of BT - which used to own O2 - in reducing the number of its small shareholders, which cost the company a lot of money to service in sending out investors' information and dividend payments. O2 - like BT - wrote to all its small shareholders offering a free share-dealing service to sell shares.

Shareholders who did not respond to the offer were assumed to want to take it up. As you did not respond, O2 sold your shares.

O2 says that while some shareholders were surprised to receive the payment, in most cases this was probably because the shareholders did not read the initial letter explaining the offer. O2's spokesman says: "We can't do any more than apologise."

Q. In July last year, I signed three contracts at the suggestion of a representative of British Gas, changing my supply of gas and electricity to British Gas and my telephone to Onetel.

I was given 21 days to withdraw the contracts without penalty. I decided against the change and spoke to British Gas, which said that I needed to contact Onetel direct. I wrote to Onetel on 15 July and received a reply on 2 August.

I then received a bill from Onetel for £3.95, which I assumed was a mistake. I have now received a further bill for £10.51, which included a £5 late payment fee regarding the £3.95 bill.

My latest letter seems to have been ignored. The rate of increase on the account is alarming. How do I stop this?
LK, Rayleigh

A. A late payment charge of £5 on a £3.95 bill is pretty steep - a rate of a bit over 1,500 per cent a year. It makes it worse that the bill should not even have been sent out. Onetel has apologised for the error and cleared your account, and is sending you £20 in compensation. There has been a stream of letters to The Independent complaining about Onetel - a sister company of British Gas - which shows no sign of diminishing.

Questions of Cash cannot guarantee to respond to all queries, and cannot give individual advice. Please do not send original documents. Write to: Questions of Cash, The Independent, 191 Marsh Wall, London E14 9RS; cash@independent.co.uk.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in