Providers call for labelling reform for ETFs

Emma Dunkley
Saturday 08 October 2011 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Leading providers of exchange-traded funds are calling for tougher regulation of the market and warn more transparency is needed to protect investors.

BlackRock, the world's largest provider, wants clearer labelling of ETFs to distinguish them from similar-sounding products which are riskier, as part of regulatory reform proposals.

Joe Linhares from ETF provider iShares said: "Since inception, ETFs have offered a range of benefits including transparency, cost efficiency and a broad range of asset classes. But, in recent years, new products have emerged with less transparency and more complexity threatening to tarnish a financial innovation."

In their simplest form, ETFs invest in a market by holding the shares of an index. More complex products, such as "leveraged ETFs", can provide twice the amount if the index rises or falls, which is a lot riskier.

Advisers also back the move to distinguish ETFs. Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial Services, said: "ETFs should be simple products. If there are more complicated versions, they should be labelled complex."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in