Property: How to track down homes under the hammer

It's happening again. Soaring house prices are forcing many home- buyers to settle for less space, or to head for auctions in search for a bargain. Rachel Fixsen warns against some of the services claiming to help them.

Rachel Fixsen
Friday 19 September 1997 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

London barrister Stewart Room is trying to buy a house in north London. "House prices are rising more than people's incomes are and that's a worry, because at the end of the day, you've got less to buy with," he says.

As long as the type of home you want stays within the price band you can afford, there's little problem. "It's when it goes outside the band that you get the concern," Mr Room says.

On average, prices are now between 6 and 7 per cent higher than last year, according to Gary Marsh, head of corporate affairs at Halifax. "We expect that to continue next year," he adds. But this national average hides sky-rocketing prices in London, where houses are up between 15 and 20 per cent.

Panic that they might be priced out of the market is driving many people to go downmarket, looking for bargain homes at auctions. But for many potential buyers, finding out just where the properties are going to be sold and when can be a headache. Auctions seem to be like buses: there may be none for weeks at a time and then several come along all at once.

To cater for this growing interest, new services listing repossessions going under the hammer are springing up as buyers prepare to save money by doing some of their own renovation. Property pages are dotted with advertisements for services offering lists of repossessions and other properties up for auction, often claiming bargains can be had.

The Property Network sends out via fax a list of houses and flats up for auction according to region. Some are repossessions. The list gives brief details of the property, date of auction, and a contact number for the estate agent handling viewing. The list is updated once a week.

The Fax Back Property Index is another service which, by area, gives details and contact numbers for cheaper properties that need doing up and are being sold through estate agents.

Both of these services cost pounds 1.50 per minute. The first service sent your reporter nine pages of details for the London region, costing about pounds 12 in phone charges. The second service sent out three pages listing properties in Yorkshire, including an index sheet, and this cost pounds 18 because it was much slower.

While services like theses save you some legwork, you can usually get information about houses up for auction free of charge by contacting auctioneers, or high street estate agents directly.

And the Fax Back Property Index, while it was still trading under its old name of the Repossessed Properties Index, has twice been investigated by the telecom watchdog ICSTIS (the Independent Committee for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services).

In March, complaints that it took over 20 minutes to receive five pages of information led to a fine of pounds 2,500. In July it was investigated for, among other things, misleading advertising as not all properties on the list were repossessions. It was fined pounds 5,000.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in