Lottery slaves and hot numbers

Should you stick to a formula or follow the form? Clifford German goes for variety

Clifford German
Tuesday 30 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lottery fever will be down to normal proportions this week after the second double rollover, but if the previous rollover is any guide demand for tickets will not fall below normal and the jackpot should be pounds 10m.

Last week's winners show that the public is not afraid to choose strings of numbers, such as 16 and 17 and 41, 42 and 43, and there are apparently several thousand people who regularly choose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, and will be bitterly disappointed at having to share the prize if such an unlikely sequence of numbers does come up.

There is no such thing as a winning system, of course, but choosing the same numbers every week is a recipe for total slavery to the lottery, because once you start you cannot stop for fear of missing the jackpot. Whatever the statisticians say, it also looks as if the same numbers do not often come up in consecutive weeks, so you could be reducing your chances if you get two winning numbers this week and repeat all the same numbers the following week.

Random selections may stand as good a chance as any, but most participants like to study form and go for numbers that have not won for a long time or for those that have come up relatively infrequently in the 62 draws to date.

Several numbers overdue for a win have come up in recent weeks but 22 has not won now for 22 weeks, and 9, 14 and 27 have also been waiting longer than they should. Numbers that have so far come up less often than average include 9, 13, 19, 20, 24, 36 and 37, but poor old 39 has only won twice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in