Keeping an eye on the professionals

Roger Trapp
Tuesday 27 June 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Bishop's plan for reorganising the accountancy profession may have been stillborn, but it has certainly galvanised the various bodies into action. While the idea of a number of regional-based organisations reporting into one overarching body has been killed off by factional interests, that does not mean things will necessarily remain as they were.

The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants are embarked on merger talks. But the Chartered Association of Certified Accountants (Acca) - always the most vocal in its opposition to the Bishop plan - says it has always maintained that the important issue is not the number of accountancy bodies but "the difficulty the public has in clearly distinguishing professionally qualified accountants from others who call themselves 'accountants' but who have lesser qualifications, or none, and who are not regulated by a recognised professional accountancy body."

It has recently suggested establishing a register of accountants and protection of the "accountant" title. But these measures would require primary legislation, which is, not surprisingly, not high on the parliamentary agenda. So today it has announced that it is proposing to its members changing its name to the Association of Chartered Public Accountants. Members, who would henceforth be known as chartered public accountants, will be asked to vote on the matter at an extraordinary general meeting in the autumn.

The move follows a similar application to the Privy Council from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy for its members to be known as chartered public finance accountants. While Acca points to this move as supporting its own position, the presence of the word "public" in both titles would surely lead to a fresh form of confusion.

But perhaps when it comes to consider all these requests, the Privy Council will also be moved by the desire to clear up another cause of bewilderment - why the Chartered Association of Certified Accountants is known as Acca.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in