Five questions on: Comparison websites

 

Simon Read
Friday 05 June 2015 15:34 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

This sounds juicy. Have comparison sites been caught cheating?

No evidence of any wrongdoing has been published yet.

However, two major price-comparison sites faced accusations of price-fixing from the energy regulator Ofgem this week. MoneySupermarket and uSwitch both admitted that they have been asked to provide information to Ofgem for its investigation into whether there has been information sharing about the commission rates charged to energy suppliers.

Information sharing?

That’s a polite way of saying pricefixing. Will Hodson, co-founder of consumer collective the Big Deal, who has been highly critical of comparison websites, said: “Commissions are a cost that end up on our bills. If comparison sites have been colluding to fix those commissions at a high level, that is a scandal.”

Is it really a scandal?

If the websites have been pricefixing, then that would be a scandal. They portray themselves as the consumers’ friends, but if they have been misleading us to bolster their own profits, then that is wrong. The sites have been hugely important in helping millions of families to save money by switching suppliers, but they are still businesses needing to make profits from us, which is worth remembering. Laith Khalaf, of Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “Pricecomparison websites have been instrumental in helping consumers to shop around for the best deal, but any investigation is likely to rock public trust in these services.

What will happen next?

Ofgem’s investigation could take many months, leaving a shadow hanging over comparison sites until they are

given a clean bill of health, or fined for breaking competition rules.

What should comparison sites do?

“They should now publish their commissions as a matter of urgency,” reckons Will Hodson.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in