Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I remember this. A whistleblower accused the big energy firms of fixing gas prices, didn't he?
That's right. Just over a year ago the City watchdog reported that it had been contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that the wholesale gas market had been regularly manipulated. Meanwhile, the energy regulator, Ofgem, said that it has been sent evidence about suspect trading.
So what's happened now? Are energy bosses going to be jailed?
Quite the opposite. Ofgem and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a statement this week which said: "It has been concluded that no evidence of the alleged market manipulation could be found and therefore that the interests of consumers have not been harmed."
Is that a whitewash?
Of course not. The regulators conducted a detailed analysis of all relevant information before coming up with their conclusion. They spent the best part of a year talking to interested parties and assessing the evidence. They can't afford not to take such accusations seriously and investigate them fully.
So the energy firms have been completely exonerated?
Of the specific allegations, yes. They related to trading on 28 September 2012 in the period leading up to 4.30pm and alleged that gas was sold at a lower price than the price of the best bid at the time in order to manipulate the benchmark price.
Is that the end of the story?
No. The fear raised by the allegation was that price manipulation would end up hitting consumers, who could be forced to pay more for energy than they needed to. Ofgem is now working to strengthen transparency within the gas market and analyse whether the current processes are working. The FCA is also monitoring energy and financial markets for any evidence of misconduct.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments