Brits should reconsider saving in foreign banks

Saturday 12 January 2013 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

People are reluctant to put their savings into foreign banks even if they offer more attractive interest rates than their British counterparts, new research from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has found.

Only 29 per cent of people would choose to a non-UK bank with high rates, while 54 per cent say they would actively avoid them. This contrasts with the run-up to 2007/8, when many people would "chase rates" and put money into foreign-owned banks, such as Icesave.

When the Icelandic banking system collapsed, thousands of UK savers were left out of pocket but were bailed out by the Exchequer. However, the FSCS points out that European banks with UK branches are now protected by the deposit insurance scheme in their home country up to a limit of €100,000 (£82,000).

And it's not just savings accounts where Britons are cautious. Only 36 per cent of people say they would insure their home or car with a cheap provider that they have not heard of before.

Mark Neale, the FSCS's chief executive, said: "This caution is understandable given the events of 2008. There has been a significant improvement in protection for savings and deposits since, yet too few people know this."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in