Pick of the Pundits: Health insurance faces a battle: Experts on the different aspects of personal finance talk to Vivien Goldsmith and Maria Scott about the prospects for 1993 as signs of recovery grow firmer: Jan Lawson

Vivien Goldsmith,Maria Scott
Friday 01 January 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jan Lawson, partner with The Private Health Partnership, expects that premium increases this year will be no more than 10 to 15 per cent, but they could be a bit less as insurers fight to hang on to business.

'People have put up with increases this year but they are threatening to cancel their insurance if there are further large rate rises.

'The development of budget packages was designed to get new people into medical insurance, but next year it will be a matter of hanging on to existing subscribers.'

Ms Lawson predicts that employers will start to reappraise their schemes and conclude that they have been too generous. Some will withdraw cover for spouses and children. Others will be moving on to a cafeteria system of benefits so employees can choose whether to take full medical cover or give it up for better pension benefits or some other staff perk.

She also believes that subscribers who are excluded from cover for pre-existing conditions will be arguing strongly - and successfully - that they should pay less for less comprehensive cover.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in