Nest pension scheme faces challenge from Denmark

Julian Knight
Saturday 05 November 2011 21:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Strong private-sector challenges are emerging to a government scheme designed to get millions of British workers saving for retirement.

Last week, the Danish firm ATP announced that it will be launching a new low-cost workplace pension called "Now: Pensions" for British employees to coincide with the advent of auto-enrolment next year.

This means that Now: Pensions will go head to head with the government-sponsored Nest pension scheme. From next October, millions of British workers who are not members of a company pension scheme will be auto-enrolled into Nest or the existing company pension scheme. Employees and their employers will have to contribute a percentage of salary into a Nest pension pot.

It was expected that Nest would become the main vehicle for these workers. However, Now: Pensions' parent company, ATP, points to its experience of managing 4.6 million workplace pensions in its home country of Denmark. Charges will be very low, with ATP promising a monthly administration fee of £1.50 and an annual charge of 0.3 per cent. According to Tom McPhail, pensions expert at independent financial advisers Hargreaves Lansdown, ATP may have the drop on Nest as far as charges are concerned. "These are very competitive, and perhaps on higher-value schemes even slightly better."

It seems Now: Pensions is not the only challenger: this week B&CE will outline its own alternative and it's rumoured that the Federation of Small Businesses will get in on the act. As a result, Nest might not hit its target. "If they attract, say, only a million people into Nest, there are going to be some painful conversations with those providing the investment schemes that Nest money is to be put into and with the Treasury," Mr McPhail said.

However, Nest senior executives seem sanguine about the competition. "You'd expect a bigger market to attract new entrants and we welcome this, especially if it improves outcomes for pension scheme members. We still expect there to be between two and five million Nest members by the end of September 2016," said Tim Jones, chief executive of Nest.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in