Five questions on... interest-only mortgages

 

Simon Read
Saturday 05 May 2012 06:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Do lenders still offer interest-only loans?

Some do, but they're getting fewer and fewer with the Co-operative Bank pulling its deals from next Tuesday while others have made it harder for borrowers to qualify by demanding much higher deposits.

What's the problem with them?

With an interest-only loan, a borrower repays none of the capital – the original amount they borrowed. Instead, the mortgage repayments only cover interest charges.

So what? Haven't most people got plenty of equity in their home?

Not anymore. Many people who took out interest-only loans in the last decade as a cheap way to get on the housing market, have seen the value of their property subsequently fall. Those that have paid none of the capital back could be in the position now of owing more than they borrowed with no way of repaying the cash. In other words they could be trapped in their existing home. Even those who don't plan to move could be facing a mortgage time bomb when the loan term is up. They may be forced to sell the home to repay the outstanding loan.

So why aren't they outlawed altogether and what should people do?

They are perfectly fine if a borrower knows how they will repay the capital once the mortgage term ends. For instance, anyone expecting a huge bonus, legacy or other cash lump sum may feel confident of covering the debt. If they haven't got that, borrowers should look to switch to a repayment loan as soon as possible.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in