Morgan charges under review

Maria Scott
Friday 21 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MORGAN Grenfell may cut the charges on its index-tracking UK unit trust to improve returns for investors.

Tony Wilkinson, a director of Morgan Grenfell Asset Management, would not commit himself to a cut but said the company was reviewing charges.

This has been prompted partly by the way they are causing the performance of the fund to drift away from the FTA All Share Index. The effect of these charges becomes clearer over a number of years, because management fees are levied annually.

Morgan Grenfell's UK Equity Index Tracker, for example, made a profit of 36.69 per cent over the three years to the beginning of this month, according to figures from Micropal, after reinvestment of taxed dividends. The All Share index increased 48.67 per cent, assuming net income from the index was reinvested.

Norwich Union's index-tracking fund increased 36.78 per cent over the same three-year period while James Capel's rose 38.6 per cent. The fund managers all blame charges for the drift. These account for the bulk of the difference between the buying and selling price of units in the funds. On most of the index funds, this is well over 5 per cent.

Micropal statistics take account of spreads to show the real return to investors.

Last year Gartmore abolished the front-end charge on its UK Index fund. It still has an annual charge, of 0.5 per cent, but the spread is less than 2 per cent.

As a result, its return over three years is only marginally adrift of the All Share over three years at 47.5 per cent. This is a slightly misleading picture of the return obtained by people who invested three years ago, because they would have paid a front-end charge, but it highlights the effect of charges.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in