Money Grouse: Would-be buyer put off BT3 shares

Friday 16 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NIGEL HARRIS, a lecturer in philosophy from Dundee, intended to apply for BT3 shares for his mother but was put off by a condition in the prospectus that he thought unreasonable.

Mr Harris's mother is unwell and has formally appointed him to handle her financial affairs by signing a document giving him power of attorney.

'Under the Powers of Attorney Act 1971, Section 3.1 (1) a copy of an instrument creating a power of attorney may be certified either by the donor of the power or by a solicitor or stockbroker,' says Mr Harris.

'It is quite clear that in law the validity of a certified copy is unaffected by which of these categories of person certifies it.'

Mr Harris was outraged, therefore, to see that the BT3 prospectus contained a clause stating that anyone applying for shares with a power of attorney must produce a document signed by a solicitor.

Since he has done all the work associated with setting up the power of attorney without involving a solicitor, he does not want to start now.

'In the case of my power of attorney over my mother's affairs all the certified copies of the power that I have were certified by my mother as donor,' he says. 'These have been accepted as valid by solicitors for the sale of a house and also as proof when purchasing shares under other flotations, where the terms and conditions have merely required 'a certified copy' to be sent.'

He has complained to the Securities and Futures Authority about the prospectus.

Explanations from SG Warburg and Linklaters & Paines, the merchant bank and solicitor advising the Government on the BT3 issue, were less than illuminating.

The requirement for people with power of attorney to submit certificates signed by solicitors is apparently traditional in government share issues.

The view of the advisers is that the Government is entitled to insist on this in its share prospectuses even though legislation on powers of attorney do not.

No explanation was available on why the Government had originally taken this view, but Mr Harris has been promised a letter from the Treasury.

Write to Money Grouse, The Independent, 40 City Road, London EC1Y 2DB. Include a daytime phone number. Please do not send original documents or SAEs.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in