Money Grouse: Barclaycard's removal service

Friday 28 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Be warned: if you ask Barclaycard to remove an authorised user from your account, you could find yourself without a card.

Heather Connon, an Independent journalist, recently returned her husband's card and asked for his name to be removed from the account. When she tried to use her card earlier this week, however, she was told the transaction had not been authorised.

She rang Barclaycard and was told that, because she had asked for the removal of an authorised user, the account had been cancelled and she would be sent a new card. She had not been warned that this was happening (although a letter is, apparently, in the post). And, because she lives in London, the replacement has to be delivered by courier - which can take up to two weeks, rather than the two days or so it would take through the post.

Barclaycard said the action was taken to protect the customer - and, of course, themselves. It said her husband could have used the PIN number to withdraw cash (although without the card, it would have been difficult), or to order goods over the phone.

While Ms Connon would have been liable until the card was cancelled, Barclaycard would have had to pick up the bill for unauthorised use thereafter.

But Ms Connon and her husband had been separated for two years - and his card lying in a drawer - so there was no likelihood of his using the card; had there been, she would have indicated that in the letter.

While Barclaycard is obviously correct to protect itself and its users as far as possible, it should surely have given Ms Connon notice of its action so that she could explain the situation. The company says it will be looking at this in the future.

Write to Money Grouse, The Independent, 40 City Road, London EC1Y 2DB. Please do not send SAEs or original documents as we cannot guarantee to deal with every letter personally.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in