Challenge to bank charges begins
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Banks came under pressure to reduce their charges yesterday as a legal challenge that could trigger refunds of millions of pounds to customers got under way.
A High Court judge began reading documents in the case brought by the Office of Fair Trading against seven high street banks and one building Society. Legal arguments begin tomorrow.
The Liberal Democrat shadow chancellor, Vince Cable, said: "Banks are not charities and it is perfectly acceptable for them to levy charges when customers breach the terms of their bank accounts. However, trying to pretend that it costs upwards of £30 to return an unpaid direct debit is laughable."
Carl Belgrove, of the National Consumer Council, called on the banks to "stop making easy money" and take a responsible attitude to their impact on customers. He added: "A charge of over £30 for an unpaid standing order is enough to trigger a spiral of debt that many people on low incomes may never fully recover from."
In the case being heard at International Dispute Resolution Centre on Fleet Street, London, the OFT is claiming that the bank's charges for unauthorised borrowing on current accounts fall under consumer contract regulations and so have to be proportionate.
The banks are believed to have hired a QC each to defend their cases; the OFT has retained one QC.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments