ASA continues claims crackdown
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Another claims management company has been rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority this week for trying to mislead borrowers about how it was able to help them wriggle out of their debts.
UK Logical, a Yorkshire-based company, invited people who wanted to “Legally Clear your Credit Cards & Loans” to get in touch with it. But the ASA ruled on Wednesday that the ads would “mislead” readers about their chances of being able to write off their debt. It also slammed the firm for not making clear that anyone responding to the ad would be charged a £50 admin fee.
The ASA said the offending ad “was likely to be understood by readers to mean that UK Logical had an 80 per cent and above success rate at clearing customers’ credit card debts and loans. Because we had not seen evidence demonstrating that that was the case, we considered the ad was likely to mislead readers about the likelihood of their debts being written off.”
The ad also claimed there were “no hidden charges”, but the ASA found it did not make it clear that UK Logical charged fees to conduct initial reviews of credit agreements, and, although those were refunded in the event of an unsuccessful audit, a £50 charge per agreement was still applied. As such, it said, “the claim |‘No hidden charges’ was misleading”.
There seem to be hundreds of these companies preying on hard-up people who will leap at the chance to ease their financial woes. The ASA has already ruled against two other firms for misleading ads this year, Debt Free UK last month, and Cartel Client Review in January.
Some believe many firms are simply “claims farming” to pick up the fees they will earn, whether or not they take up anyone’s case.
The claims companies’ legal argument is based around the concept of
unenforceable loan agreements which is built on the fact that some loan contracts written before 2007 may not be properly worded under the terms of the 1974 Consumer Credit Act.
Finding evidence that anyone has actually managed to have their debt written off under this principle is difficult, although some banks appear to have backed down rather than face legal fees when they have been taken to court about the matter.
That doesn’t necessarily mean that people have the right to try and get their own loan or credit card written off. Indeed, there’s no question of anyone actually being disadvantaged by being mis-sold a loan or credit card. It seems the argument that these firms use to encourage people to pay them a fee is an untested legal loophole.
Lloyds Banking Group was behind the latest complaint to the ASA but anyone can complain about misleading financial ads. For information, go to: www.asa.org.uk/asa/how_to_complain.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments