Investors anxious as L&Y admits mistakes: Problems facing Lancashire & Yorkshire Assurance could take months to sort out, Maria Scott reports

Maria Scott
Friday 04 December 1992 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

HUNDREDS of anxious investors telephoned Lancashire & Yorkshire Assurance this week to seek advice and reassurance following the friendly society's revelations about mistakes that may result in demands for compensation.

Some investors are cashing in their policies, although this may not turn out to be the best course of action.

Friendly society policies are for a minimum of 10 years. L&Y does not pay any early-surrender values on policies started less than 12 months ago. From then on, its payments are governed by rules laid down under friendly society legislation, which allow policyholders to receive the lesser of the current value of their investments or the total value of premiums paid.

Since the maximum investment a friendly society tax-exempt policy can accept in a year is pounds 200, surrender values may be paltry.

Paul Brighton, marketing executive with the independent adviser Abbey National Financial Services, said: 'Investors are guaranteed to lose out if they surrender early. They will not necessarily lose if they sit tight.'

One Independent reader said he had been contemplating taking out policies for his three children, having already started policies for himself and his wife. L&Y is not taking on new business, so taking out new policies is not an option.

It will not take on new business again until its current problems are resolved. It is seeking court rulings to do this and it is likely to be months before the issues are sorted out.

The rulings could result in the society paying compensation to some policyholders, which could weaken its financial position. However, there is no suggestion that it is insolvent, and it is continuing to pay maturity values and death benefits as normal. Even if the compensation bill is large and the society does not want to reopen for new business, it could close its existing funds but run policies to their maturity dates. Another option is to seek a merger with another society.

A series of problems affect more than half L&Y's 70,000 policies. The society is under new management, which has vowed to seek a resolution to the difficulties.

L&Y started investing in properties about five years ago. The value of these investments has more than halved to pounds 2.5m. Fifty-three per cent of L&Y's policies were invested in property through its Capital Secure Fund but the policy details did not give specific permission for the money to be used this way.

The society needs a court ruling to see whether these policies are valid and whether it should compensate people for losses on the property investments.

Other investors could find that the proceeds of their L&Y policies will be liable to tax as a result of the way they have been set up. The society accepted lump sums from some policyholders and used these to pay regular contributions in its savings schemes. It is not clear whether L&Y was permitted to fund the policies this way.

L&Y's third problem was that it sold policies between October 1990 and 5 December 1991 whose terms had not been formally approved by the Registry of Friendly Societies. The tax-free status of these policies is also in doubt.

Friendly societies operate a voluntary compensation scheme. This will pay out 90 per cent of the sum assured under the policy - this is normally the minimum amount payable under the policy on death - plus any bonuses paid to date. However, it does not cover the value added to the minimum sum assured in a unit-linked policy. All L&Y's policies are unit-linked. Compensation would only be paid if the society was insolvent.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in