Holidaymakers get hit by the small print in policies

Saturday 03 April 2010 19:00 EDT
Comments
(AFP )

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Travellers are being routinely let down by their holiday insurers, according to consumer group Which? New research shows that insurers operate vastly different policies when it comes to paying out claims.

For example, only 41 per cent of insurers will cover the policyholder if their airline goes out of business, while 18 per cent pay in cases of holiday disruption due to a terrorist act.

"Holidaymakers tend to assume that if they've taken out travel insurance, they'll be covered for disasters beyond their control – an airline or hotel chain going bust, or getting caught up in an act of terrorism. Sadly, our research has found that's not always the case," said Rochelle Turner, a researcher at Which?.

"The travel insurance industry must up its game and start to provide policies customers can rely on, or at least make their policies clear rather than hiding exclusions in the small print."

In response, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said that policies differ for good reasons. ABI spokesman Malcolm Tarling said, "You can't just have an identikit policy for everyone. For starters, if you covered everything the policy would be too expensive for many. Look at the stats produced by the financial ombudsman service: on average there is one dispute for every 12,700 policies sold. Insurers have to make their terms and conditions clear. The onus is on the purchaser to ensure it covers what they need."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in