How to get a slice of the windfall action

Nic Cicutti
Tuesday 22 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Within the next 24 hours, millions of Nationwide Building Society members will discover whether they are on course to receive an average of pounds 2,000 in free shares - or if their society's defence of mutuality will lead to them benefiting in a more subdued but longer-term manner.

Votes in the elections for the Nationwide board have been counted and may be announced today. The ballot is make-or-break for proponents of the conversion strategy, which would see the society seeking a stock-market flotation.

Five candidates to the board, led by Michael Hardern, a part-time butler, favour immediate flotation. If they triumph over the board's own candidates, the Nationwide will have no choice but to obey its members' democratic mandate.

Unexpectedly, the campaign has attracted considerable interest from members, more than one million of whom - a third of the potential electorate - have voted.

Nationwide argues that the benefits of mutuality are such that over a decade or so, a joint mortgage borrower and saver can easily receive more in better rates from the society than they might receive in free shares. By competing with the banks in this way, the society adds, it ensures that millions of people receive a better deal.

Mr Hardern and his friends reply that free shares will more than compensate those who vote to abandon mutual status.

Although the battle for the soul of Nationwide has already been decided one way or another, that of other societies has not.

The Nationwide vote will give a good indication of the mood of members in other, smaller societies. They have watched as Halifax, Alliance & Leicester, Woolwich and Northern Rock members enjoy share windfalls and may want a slice of the action.

If so, even the most diehard supporter of mutuality must conclude that while a few rearguard battles are still to be fought, the main war has been lost.

That means investors should begin to target societies which will in all likelihood "crystallise" their value. This may be done in a variety of ways: the most obvious, that of flotation, is unlikely to extend to many more societies, which are too small to seek a stock-market listing.Then there is the potential takeover of many smaller societies. Many would make tempting targets for predators. Lastly, there is the potential for intra-society mergers.

For those who have already opened accounts with such societies, there is the more difficult question of mutually owned insurance companies and their long-term prospects. But that's the subject of another piece in these pages

Nic Cicutti

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in