Ethics poser for investors
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A SURVEY by the Consumers' Association magazine Which? highlights the difficulties facing people seeking a unit trust that salves their consciences over issues such as animal welfare and the environment.
Seventeen ethical and environmental funds were assessed according to how well they deal with five areas of concern - arms, green issues, human rights, political donations and animal welfare.
Which? gave each fund a score, produced by the Ethical Investment Research Service (Eiris). One of 100 per cent meant no investments in companies involved in the problem area, while 50 per cent meant the fund had half as many investments in the area as would be represented in the FT All-Share index.
Clerical Medical's Evergreen Trust came out with scores of 100 per cent for animals, arms and political donations. Its green score was 77 per cent and its human rights score 98 per cent. It had the highest overall score of 475.
The lowest score on the Which? assessment was also a green fund, TSB's Environmental Investor Fund. It had the worst score for avoiding animal exploitation, 48, as it invests in Unilever which tests cosmetics on animals, said Which?.
A TSB spokesman said: 'The constituents of the fund fall clearly in the guidelines. If any investor wants to know about the guidelines they are free to ask us.'
This really is the best advice to anyone looking for a so-called ethical investment, because each fund has its own criteria, which will not suit every investor.
Co-operative Insurance Society's CIS Environ Trust was highlighted for investing in companies such as BOC, which has subsidiaries in countries condemned by Amnesty International for human rights abuses, and Siebe, which makes parts for nuclear submarines and has a subsidiary in South Africa.
Martin Clarke, marketing manager for CIS Unit Managers, said these investments fitted the fund's aims - of investing in companies protecting the environment and human health and safety. BOC supplied medicine and Siebe was involved in pollution control.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments