Cheaper household insurance on offer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AFTER YEARS of steeply rising premiums, fierce competition is breaking out in household insurance, writes Vivien Goldsmith.
Direct Line, the telephone insurer owned by Royal Bank of Scotland, has increased the number of factors taken into account to assess premiums, such as the home-owner's age, and claims it can offer a cheaper deal on buildings and contents insurance for 90 per cent of households. The average saving, it claims, will be a third of current bills.
It is also keeping up its campaign against building societies that tie down borrowers to their own deals.
For a 35-year-old in a house in Barnet, north London, with rebuilding costs of pounds 82,000 and contents worth pounds 18,500, Direct Line would charge annual premiums of pounds 515 compared with pounds 703 from Sun Alliance, pounds 666 from Guardian Royal Exchange and pounds 658 from Norwich Union. Direct Line would charge pounds 589 including accidental damage cover compared with pounds 762 from Woolwich Building Society.
Royal Insurance is launching a new household contents insurance policy that takes into account the level of security and home-owner's age.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments