Words: Youngster

Nicholas Bagnall
Saturday 29 November 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

"We Are simply not giving enough time for our youngsters in schools," declared former cricketer Colin Cowdrey in his maiden speech last week in the Lords, meaning time for sport, and he was almost certainly right. But what is it about the word youngster that makes me cringe a little? Am I alone here? Thinking about it, I concluded that it had something to do with half-buried memories from childhood, when one seemed to be constantly bothered by genial old buffers saying "Out of the way, youngster", and suchlike bufferish remarks, which sounded pretty patronising at the time.

But of course Lord Cowdrey didn't mean to patronise. Youngster is a perfectly acceptable term among sportsmen for up-and-coming hopefuls, whether humans, horses or dogs. It was the Elizabethans' word for a lively young person, and it was only later that the idea of sparkiness receded and the idea of immaturity took over; Edward Phillips's 1706 dictionary was at the halfway mark when it defined youngster both as "an airy, brisk young man" and "a raw or inexperienced youth".

There is another difficulty though. A youngster is usually thought of as male, so if his lordship wasn't being ageist he was certainly being a bit sexist. Strangely enough, in its early heyday the -ster suffix was meant for a female. A woman dancer in Old English was a hopster, just as a songster was a woman singer and a spinster a woman spinner. The real problem now is that there seems to be no good single word that means a young person of either sex. Youths and lads are male, and neither is entirely satisfactory even for them - youth has a court-room smell, and lads can be any age. Children is hardly right for teenagers these days. Kids was the modish term for all young people in the progressive 1970s, but has dated. I can't imagine its being heard all that often in the House of Lords.

Nicholas Bagnall

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in