NHS secretary becomes oldest person ever to win ageism case at 88
Eileen Jolly was dismissed due to ‘frailty’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An 88-year-old NHS secretary who was dismissed from her job over “frailty” claims has become the oldest person to win an age discrimination case.
Eileen Jolly was fired from her role at the Royal Berkshire Hospital in Reading in January 2017. She was 86 years old at the time.
Her age came under scrutiny after she allegedly failed to upload details of cancer patients into a new electronic database, which meant that 14 women had to wait more than a year for non-urgent surgery.
The error prompted Jolly’s colleagues to inform her boss that they were concerned her age was affecting her performance.
Jolly, who had been working at the hospital for 25 years, felt “humiliated” and “degraded” that she was dismissed, and proceeded to sue the Royal Berkshire NHS Trust on the basis of unfair dismissal.
At the time, she was reportedly escorted out of the hospital and prescribed antidepressants.
According to The Daily Telegraph, she had lied to friends and family about why she’d left her job, telling everyone, including her husband, that she’d retired because she was embarrassed to reveal what really happened.
Her husband died two weeks prior to her hearing. It’s not clear whether or not he knew the truth about why Jolly had left her job.
On Wednesday, it was announced that Jolly had won her claim and would be awarded compensation in October.
Judge Andrew Gumbiti-Zimuto, who ruled on the hearing, explained that Jolly’s error might’ve been down to inadequate training and said that she was performing her role "competently" prior to dismissal.
He said: “There is a suspicion of the Claimant being a scapegoat, the Claimant was not offered training where it might be considered appropriate."
Gumbiti-Zimuto added that there was evidence to suggest Jolly had been trained "on the job" on an ad hoc basis.
Meanwhile, Jolly has not read the judgement yet and revealed she will be meeting with her solicitor soon to discuss the next steps.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments