An Instagram advert for Halloween outfits has been banned for objectifying women

The ASA has ruled that advert implied ‘women should aspire to being objectified’ and ‘was likely to cause serious offence’

Olivia Petter
Wednesday 14 April 2021 13:06 EDT
Comments
Advert for Halloween outfits banned for objectifying women

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

An Instagram advertisement for Halloween costumes by retailer Babyboo Fashion has been banned by the advertising watchdog for objectifying women.

The advertisement was in the form of a video posted on Instagram in October and featured shots of women wearing lingerie, some paired with angel wings, others with animal ears.

The video carried a voiceover taken from a clip from the 2004 film Mean Girls that quoted the character Cady Heron (played by Lindsay Lohan) saying: “Halloween is the one night a year when a girl can dress like a total [bleeped out] and no other girls can say anything about it. The hardcore girls just wear lingerie and some form of animal ears.”

However, a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) argued that the advertisement was sexist.

“The complainant, who believed the ad was sexist, objectifying, and gave a harmful message to young women, challenged whether it was offensive and irresponsible”, the ASA states.

Babyboo Fashion did not respond to the ASA’s enquiries, however, the organisation ruled that the advert should be banned.

Explaining its ruling, the organisation stated: “Although the models were shown in lingerie, we considered that most of the poses were not overly sexualised.

“However, in contrast, one shot depicted two models in lingerie and angel wings, kneeling on a bed with their legs apart. Both models looked at the camera seductively, while one of them twirled her hair and the other model moved her hands along her thighs.

“We considered that the shots of the models on the bed were suggestive, the poses were unnecessarily sexualised and had the effect of objectifying the women.”

It added that it understood the bleeped out word in the advert was “s***” as that is the word used in Mean Girls.

“We understood that the voiceover quote was taken from a film. However, we considered it was presented out of context and was likely to be taken at face value,” the ASA added.

“The term ‘s***’ was a negative stereotype of women and was commonly used to refer to women who had or were perceived to have many sexual partners, in a derogatory way that passed judgment on those behaviours,” they added.

“We considered that the use of that word in the context of the ad was likely to be seen as demeaning to women.”

The ASA went on to say that the message perpetuated by the advert was one that suggested women should aspire to be admired for their looks.

“While there was nothing inherently wrong with dressing in the way shown in the ad, or having multiple sexual partners, we considered that linking those things with the denigrating term ‘s***’, and implying women should aspire to being objectified, was problematic,” it stated.

“Overall, we considered that the ad was likely to cause serious offence and included a gender stereotype in a way that was likely to cause harm. We therefore concluded that the ad was irresponsible and breached the Code.”

The Independent has contacted Babyboo Fashion for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in