Woman sues Sephora after claiming lipstick sample gave her herpes
Now she’s warning others about the dangers of in-store testers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A woman from California is suing beauty giant Sephora after claiming she contracted herpes from using one of the store's lipstick samples.
Elena Davoyan says she had never had herpes or cold sores prior to visiting the store back in October 2015, but after testing a “common use” sampler at a Los Angeles branch she was diagnosed with the viral disease, TMZ reports.
Now, in a bid to warn other make-up fans about the danger of testing in-store cosmetics Davoyan is suing Sephora for $25,000 for emotional distress in addition to liability, negligence and intentional infliction, according to court documents.
As such the lawsuit, which has been filed by lawyer Robert Kransey, argues that the store encourages communal lipstick use and that many of its displays fail to warn customers of the dangers of using them.
Davoyan also claims that Sephora doesn’t have satisfactory practices in place to avoid herpes exposure, such as providing customers with “lipstick wands or swabs.”
“The bottom line is that (there) are numerous simple solutions to prevent the spreading of diseases through lipstick testers, and that is Sephora’s responsibility,” the lawsuit reads.
In response, Sephora says that customer safety is their first concern.
“The health and safety of our clients is our foremost priority,” the brand told Daily News.
“We take product hygiene very seriously and we are dedicated to following best practices in our stores.”
Amesh Adalja, an infectious disease specialist from Johns Hopkins University, told Live Science that while it is possible for a person to contract herpes from a lipstick, it is not common.
Instead, it’s likely that the person already had the virus: “I would suspect that many people who think they get herpes from certain things were already positive [for the virus], because it's such a common and unavoidable infection,” he said.
That being said, with a 2005 Rowan University study revealing that public make-up testers carry staph, strep and even E. coli bacteria, it makes sense to take precautions when using beauty samples.
While many stores already clean their products, you can use rubbing alcohol to wipe the product down or alternatively use a Q-tip or sample sponge instead of applying it directly.
The Independent has contacted Sephora for comment.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments