Pushing early could be the safest way to give birth
Doing so could lower the risk of haemorrhage and infection
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The best time to push during childbirth has long been an area of contention, with some extolling the virtues of bearing down early while others insisting expectant mothers should wait.
So far, evidence has been inconclusive, but now a new study has revealed that early pushing could in fact lower a woman's odds of haemorrhage and infection.
To investigate which approach is better for expectant mothers and their babies, a team of researchers from the Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis organised a study of 2,400 first-time mothers.
From May 2014 to December 2017, six American hospitals participated in the study to determine which method is the safest, with staff advising half the women to push immediately after being fully dilated while recommending the others to wait an hour longer.
Of those in the immediate-pushing group 1,031 (85.9 per cent) delivered vaginally compared with 1,041 (86.5 per cent) in the delayed-pushing group – proving that timing had no effect on a woman’s need for surgical delivery.
However, the findings did show that women in the immediate-pushing group experienced significantly lower rates of infections and fewer episodes of excessive bleeding following delivery.
Specifically, 80 (6.7 per cent) of the women who began pushing immediately developed an infection compared with 110 women (9.1 per cent) who delayed pushing.
In addition, 27 (2.3 per cent) in the immediate-pushing group suffered severe postpartum bleeding, compared with 48 (4 per cent) in the delayed-pushing group.
What’s more, women who pushed immediately also experienced a shorter second-stage of labour by an average of 30 minutes, compared with those who delayed pushing.
“Pushing during labour is physically demanding and intense,” said the study’s first author, Alison Cahill, MD, a Washington University associate professor of obstetrics and gynaecology and director of the Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
“Women look to their obstetric providers for guidance and what’s best for them and their babies. Our findings can guide providers to better manage the second stage of labour for optimal health for moms and their babies.
“This means avoiding delayed pushing for the sake of increasing the chance of vaginal delivery since it is associated with longer labour time and higher health risks to mothers and babies.”
The study, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), was published October 9 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments