Whatever they say to confuse us, it's charges that count
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.How do people end up with personal pension policies where the value of their fund barely matches the contributions they have paid in, even after 10 or 15 years? A rip-off, in other words.
There are many theories as to why this happens. Perhaps the most persuasive is that making decisions on how to provide for an event many decades away is boring. It is not made any easier by the fact that personal pension literature is often written in indecipherable language.
Consequently, many people may start out with good intentions but, faced with a combination of terminal tedium and unintelligible rubbish, plump for the first product shoved under their nose by a salesman.
This is all very understandable. But it may turn out to be a mistake. Choosing the wrong pension product can mean ending up with something so loaded with unnecessary expenses that your pension fund at retirement may be almost halved.
Many financial advisers argue that how much you receive at retirement depends on the performance of the fund in which you are investing.
It is a reasonable argument. Sadly, it does not hold much water for most fund management companies. The fact is that most are about average most of the time. What distinguishes them from each other is their fees. Take one that charges 1 per cent of your money each year to look after it and another that takes 2 per cent. Little difference, is there? But over 25 years, the second firm would have to achieve a performance 25 per cent better than the first just to overcome the impact of its fees.
Here are some questions to ask a prospective provider.
What does it cost to pay premiums each month? Look for companies that levy little or nothing for each premium, whether it is monthly or one- off payments. Good companies will charge no more than pounds 2 to pounds 4 per payment, or 3 to 4 per cent.
What are the annual charges? Look for companies that charge 1 per cent or less to manage your money each year.
How are charges levied? Some companies will tell you that their average annual charges are 1 per cent or slightly higher. What they do not tell you is that their average is low because they sting you heavily upfront, only lessening the load after five or 10 years. Others take a larger cut of your initial payments, calling them "capital" or "initial units". Look for a company that has flat-rate charges. Most important, never choose a firm where the adviser cannot explain properly how the charges are levied.
Is the independent adviser (always choose one of them) prepared to cut his or her commission, or accept a fee? Aim to pay no more than pounds 300 to pounds 400 to set up a simple, uncomplicated pension. This is equivalent to about three or four hours' work.
How flexible is the pension? Unless you are very unusual, you will work for several different employers in your lifetime, some of them with occupational pension schemes you should join. You may get divorced or lose your job, or have children or want to increase or cut your contributions. Choose a pension that allows you to do these things without extra charges.
Should you pay single or regular contributions? With regular premiums, the adviser will receive upfront commission based on the expected period of your contributions. This takes a large slice of your first two years' payments. Single premiums mean the adviser gets about 4 to 5 per cent of everything you pay in but no more. Choose this option, or something called a "recurring single premium" pension, where every payment counts as a one-off.
Despite all these warnings, you may still be bamboozled. This is the fault of the companies and some advisers who still try it on. If you believe this is a deliberate tactic, blank them out.
If, despite the advice above, you are uncertain of which companies to look at, here are the names of several among the lowest-charging: Virgin, Eagle Star, Flemings, Scottish Widows, Merchant Investors, Equitable Life, Standard Life, PensionStore. Get details from at least one of them.
Then, if your adviser recommends others, ask how they compare. Ask for cost comparisons based on the same premiums paid in. Once you have them, check the company's past performance, then choose.
Nic Cicutti has written a free 52-page 'Guide to Pensions Planning' for the 'Independent on Sunday'. The guide, sponsored by Equitable Life, is available by calling 0800 137372.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments