trainers - how to crack the code

Trainers change faster than you can say `Nike Air Max'. So what should your feet be wearing? By Fiona Sturges

Fiona Sturges
Saturday 14 December 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sweeping judgements can be made by a mere glance at someone's feet - you'd be better off going to a club wearing your mum's slippers than a pair of Converse baseball boots. So what is the once-a-year clubber supposed to buy? Will it be the ultra-violet, bulbous, sci-fi model with low-profile zoom air unit and a phylon lateral support wing or the pancake- flat suede style for the skateboarding dare-devils? Should one go for the chunky, flat laces or the thinner round ones, and what is the correct way to tie them? Should the tongues loosely loll out or be neatly tucked away? Do you pronounce it Nike to rhyme with bike or spikey? What is the criteria for purchasing a pair of trainers and how can we crack this "code of cool"?

If you would rather not have the bouncers laughing and pointing at your feet while queueing for a club this Christmas, here is a bluffers guide to the four best-selling trainers and whether you should, or shouldn't be seen in them.

1. Nike Air Max (pounds 109.99): Top of the range in lightweight organic cyber-footwear with the latest in air-technology, reflective materials and all the other bits that give them that Trekkie look. "You can never go wrong with a good pair of Nike's - especially if you're a student." says The Face fashion department.

2. Adidas Galaxy (pounds 44.99): Originally sported by Brit-pop icons, Adidas attracts a different customer to Nike -those who prefer a simpler, more casual design and a retro look. "The Jamiroquai of sneakers and, like him, now transcending fashionability," says The Face. The Mixmag verdict: "The Adidas designs are much of a muchness. They use to be worn by the Acid Jazz types; now they're worn by16-year-olds."

3. Reebok Classics (pounds 49.99): are old favourites. They are bought by the fashion-conscious who would rather not have to upgrade their footwear every few months. "Worn by real geezers, you know, squeaky-clean, casual London boys," says Kirsty Drury of Mixmag. "Choice of the true urban homeboy. And acid Ted," adds The Face.

4. Vans Razor (pounds 62.00): These used to be the definitive "old school" skateboarder's shoe before, according to the true skaters, they became a corporate cliche. They are trying to return to the fold by donating a proportion of their profits to keeping the skate scene alive. "A skateboarder wouldn't be seen dead in these," says Mixmag. "They're grim, they're bland and I don't like the name. I'd rather wear my cowboy boots." says Katie Grande from Dazed and Confused.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in